This is a blog designed to share the madness of our society which we call normal. It contains tales of exploration of my relationship with authority as I move towards self authority.
hi, i have been a member of tpuc for a while now as john harris is spot on with the illusion we are living in now highly recommended to anyone who wants to open their eyes, just been watching your everything is ok vids they are hilarious and similar to tpuc vids in the harrasment you get from the revenue officers making up laws as they go along,have you thought of combining your humour with tpuc message ,keep up the love police lol good luck.d ps may have posted this 3 times sorry.
hi, i been a member of tpuc for a few months now as john harris is spot on with the illusion we all living in highly recommended to anyone who wants to open their eyes, just started watching your vids they are hilarious and similar to my interest in the police state we living in,maybe you could combine your humour with the revolutions messages,just a thought keep up the funny love police and remember they aint awake yet...
hi danny. now in regards to all you said prior to "when did 'i' actually come into being" it seems to me you were spot on the mark. so i assume you meant you wanted to hear thoughts regarding "when did the 'i' come into being".
perhaps the 'i' comes into being the moment there is thought. or in the moment that there is observation. for when there is thought there is the thinker and there is the thought. thus there is fragmentation or separation between the thinker and the thought, and between the observer and the observed. when it is seen that the thinker is the thought, or the observer is the observed then there no longer is that separation. i have had this experience (ironic that i use the word i to explain it i know). but in that moment there was no 'i'. there simply was.
at the time i was reading a text of jidu krishnamurti speaking of this. and i looked into it. i saw how it was the thinker that created the thought. without the thinker there would not be that thought and vise versa. and so as i sat there, in that moment the thought and the thinker became one. and the thought was no longer there nor was the thinker. i lack a better way to describe it but all i can say is that 'there just was what was'. there was no 'i' in that moment.
This is a blog designed to share the madness of our society which we call normal. It contains tales of exploration of my relationship with authority as I move towards self authority.
4 Comments:
hi,
i have been a member of tpuc for a while now as john harris is spot on with the illusion we are living in now highly recommended to anyone who wants to open their eyes, just been watching your everything is ok vids they are hilarious and similar to tpuc vids in the harrasment you get from the revenue officers making up laws as they go along,have you thought of combining your humour with tpuc message ,keep up the love police lol good luck.d
ps may have posted this 3 times sorry.
hi,
i been a member of tpuc for a few months now as john harris is spot on with the illusion we all living in highly recommended to anyone who wants to open their eyes, just started watching your vids they are hilarious and similar to my interest in the police state we living in,maybe you could combine your humour with the revolutions messages,just a thought keep up the funny love police and remember they aint awake yet...
This post has been removed by the author.
hi danny.
now in regards to all you said prior to "when did 'i' actually come into being" it seems to me you were spot on the mark. so i assume you meant you wanted to hear thoughts regarding "when did the 'i' come into being".
perhaps the 'i' comes into being the moment there is thought. or in the moment that there is observation. for when there is thought there is the thinker and there is the thought. thus there is fragmentation or separation between the thinker and the thought, and between the observer and the observed. when it is seen that the thinker is the thought, or the observer is the observed then there no longer is that separation. i have had this experience (ironic that i use the word i to explain it i know). but in that moment there was no 'i'. there simply was.
at the time i was reading a text of jidu krishnamurti speaking of this. and i looked into it. i saw how it was the thinker that created the thought. without the thinker there would not be that thought and vise versa. and so as i sat there, in that moment the thought and the thinker became one. and the thought was no longer there nor was the thinker. i lack a better way to describe it but all i can say is that 'there just was what was'. there was no 'i' in that moment.
Post a Comment
<< Home